Microsoft is migrating Minecraft away from Amazon Web Services (AWS) and onto Azure according to reports – almost six years after acquiring Mojang, the game’s creator.

The Redmond giant told CNBC in a statement that it was in the process of ‘migrating all cloud services to Azure over the last few years.’

Microsoft bought Mojang in 2014, with the Swedish game developer saying the price was $2.5 billion. The company had previously utilised AWS for its infrastructure. At the beginning of that year, AWS evangelist Jeff Barr wrote a blog post explaining how then-new multiplayer hosting service Minecraft Realms utilised Amazon’s cloud. Amazon EC2 and S3 were used, along with file storage, relational database storage, and elastic load balancing.

More recently, in an interview for GamesIndustry.Biz earlier this month, Matt Booty, head of Microsoft studios, mentioned the possibility of a migration. “We had a lot to learn from Mojang,” said Booty. “It would be easy for a large organisation to come in and say: ‘Hey, we’re going to show you how it’s done. We’re going to get you off this Java code. We’re going to get things moved over to C. We’re going to get you off Amazon Web Services and over to Azure.’

“But it’s important to realise that the conditions that created Minecraft, how it came to be, are likely to be things that are difficult to recreate with a more corporate structure,” Booty added.

This may help to explain the considerations behind such moves, not to mention the effort involved in undertaking it. Microsoft having every company in its portfolio running on its own infrastructure makes all kinds of sense, from pure financial reasons – not strengthening a rival – to showcasing it as a good example of migration. But it is never as simple as flipping a switch.

LinkedIn, another horse in the Microsoft stable, only began its ‘multi-year’ Azure migration plans in earnest this time last year, having been acquired in 2016. The company had already utilised Azure for areas such as video delivery and machine translation. Yet one interesting line which came out from that story was that, according to VentureBeat, LinkedIn had ‘independence’ in decision making: in other words, Azure was not forced upon it.

AWS, for its part, has spent years trying to free itself from Oracle, upon which many of its databases were built. In October, the company said it had finally switched off its last Oracle consumer database, although some third-party applications remained ‘tightly bound’ and therefore were unable to be migrated.

Microsoft added that the move will be ‘fully transitioned by the end of the year’, according to CNBC. CloudTech has contacted Microsoft for comment.

Picture credit: IGDB.com

Interested in hearing industry leaders discuss subjects like this and sharing their experiences and use-cases? Attend the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo World Series with upcoming events in Silicon Valley, London and Amsterdam to learn more.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here